PreK-8 Concord Public School (CPS) District
# of Responses: 70 |
Strongly Disagree |
Disagree |
Agree |
Strongly Agree |
No Answer |
|
1. Parent Participation |
||||||
|
I was an active participant in
my child’s Team meeting. |
3 |
0 |
3 |
64 |
. |
|
My concerns and vision for my
student were included in the Team/IEP process. |
3 |
0 |
3 |
62 |
2 |
|
The discussion focused on what
my child requires to make progress. |
3 |
0 |
4 |
62 |
1 |
2. Team
Meeting Process |
||||||
|
The Team meeting followed a
logical sequence. |
3 |
0 |
8 |
59 |
. |
|
If applicable, evaluation
results were discussed and considered. |
2 |
1 |
6 |
58 |
3 |
|
My child’s current academic
levels and in-class performance were discussed. |
2 |
1 |
7 |
60 |
. |
3. The IEP |
||||||
|
My child’s current academic
levels and in-class performance were included in the IEP. |
1 |
2 |
8 |
45 |
14 |
|
My child’s IEP was completed at
the Team meeting. |
3 |
1 |
12 |
36 |
13 |
|
I left the meeting with either a
Team meeting summary or a copy of the completed IEP. |
2 |
0 |
8 |
36 |
24 |
4. Other
Recommendations / Non-Eligible Students |
||||||
|
My child is not eligible for special education, but clear recommendations were made based on the information discussed at the meeting. |
. |
. |
. |
10 |
. |
5.
Overall Satisfaction |
||||||
|
I was satisfied with the Team
meeting process. |
2 |
. |
4 |
56 |
8 |
Draft IEPs |
||||||
NO |
YES |
|||||
|
A draft IEP was used in the Team meeting. | 44 |
||||
|
If yes: I received a draft at
the Team meeting |
35 |
||||
|
I received a draft prior to the
Team meeting |
5 |
|
Concord SPED PAC
webpages,
created
November 27, 2007, by Melody Orfei
Webpage
last
modified on November 27, 2007 - V1, by Melody
Orfei
|
|